Brott v Grey [2000] FCA 1836
As there were no special circumstances justifying a departure from the general rule, and the applicant failed in his application, the respondents are entitled to their costs. The involvement of the trustee was necessary and proper, and the applicant's partial success did not warrant a different order on costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Deed of Arrangement / Post Final Judgment on Costs
- Outcome
- Applicant to pay the respondents’ costs; previous order as to costs takes effect immediately
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'disposition of Costs' 'special Circumstances in Costs Awards' 'deed of Arrangement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Deed of Arrangement / Post Final Judgment on Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should follow the event in the absence of special circumstances' 'Whether there were any special circumstances to justify an order other than costs following the event']
Ratio Decidendi
As there were no special circumstances justifying a departure from the general rule, and the applicant failed in his application, the respondents are entitled to their costs. The involvement of the trustee was necessary and proper, and the applicant's partial success did not warrant a different order on costs.
Court Disposition
Applicant to pay the respondents’ costs; previous order as to costs takes effect immediately
Orders
- ['The order as to costs made on 29 November 2000 take effect forthwith.' "The applicant pay the respondents' costs of and incidental to the further issue of costs and of the appearance today."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment