Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council & Ors; Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council [2011] NSWLEC 218
The application to vacate the hearing dates was dismissed because the supporting evidence (medical certificate) was inadequate, incomplete, and not subject to cross-examination, and the factual foundation was not revealed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application to Vacate Hearing Dates
- Outcome
- Application to vacate hearing dates dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['application to Vacate Hearing Dates' 'dismissal for Want of Prosecution' 'preparation for Trial']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application to Vacate Hearing Dates
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the hearing dates should be vacated based on the applicant's medical certificate" 'Adequacy of evidence to support vacation of hearing' 'Consequence of non-appearance and potential dismissal for want of prosecution']
Ratio Decidendi
The application to vacate the hearing dates was dismissed because the supporting evidence (medical certificate) was inadequate, incomplete, and not subject to cross-examination, and the factual foundation was not revealed.
Court Disposition
Application to vacate hearing dates dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application to vacate the hearing dates is dismissed with costs.' 'Directions sought by the Council concerning the preparation for trial and its application to dismiss proceedings for want of prosecution are made.' 'A copy of these reasons is to be served on Mr Jeray by 12.00 noon Thursday 24 November 2011 in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment