Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council [2013] FCA 606

Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council [2013] FCA 606

There was no sufficient doubt about the correctness of the Federal Circuit Court's decision refusing to reopen consent orders to warrant its reconsideration by the Full Court, nor would substantial injustice result if leave were refused, as the principles regarding finality of litigation and exceptional circumstances were correctly applied and no material errors were demonstrated.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal (bankruptcy) / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['application for Leave to Appeal' 'setting Aside Orders' 'abuse of Process' 'fraud Allegations' 'finality of Litigation']
['bankruptcy' 'civil Procedure' 'appeals'] ['application for Leave to Appeal' 'setting Aside Orders' 'abuse of Process' 'fraud Allegations' 'finality of Litigation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal (bankruptcy) / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Circuit Court order dismissing the application to reopen final orders' 'Whether there is sufficient doubt about the correctness of the decision to warrant reconsideration by the Full Court' 'Whether substantial injustice would occur if leave to appeal were refused']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no sufficient doubt about the correctness of the Federal Circuit Court's decision refusing to reopen consent orders to warrant its reconsideration by the Full Court, nor would substantial injustice result if leave were refused, as the principles regarding finality of litigation and exceptional circumstances were correctly applied and no material errors were demonstrated.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The application for leave to appeal filed 30 May 2013 be dismissed.' 'The applicant pay the respondent costs of the application for leave to appeal as agreed or taxed.']