Jeray v Blue Mountains City Council [2024] NSWCATAP 66
Mr Jeray was not denied procedural fairness by the Tribunal's failure to inform him about summons procedures, as he could have accessed this information, was experienced before the Tribunal, and suffered no practical injustice. The criteria for granting leave to appeal from interlocutory decisions were not satisfied.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Decisions in Tribunal Proceedings
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['procedural Fairness' 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Decisions' 'summons Procedures' 'self Represented Litigant Assistance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Decisions in Tribunal Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal denied Mr Jeray procedural fairness in making interlocutory directions' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted from procedural (interlocutory) decisions']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Jeray was not denied procedural fairness by the Tribunal's failure to inform him about summons procedures, as he could have accessed this information, was experienced before the Tribunal, and suffered no practical injustice. The criteria for granting leave to appeal from interlocutory decisions were not satisfied.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['A hearing is dispensed with on the remaining issues on appeal.' 'Leave to appeal from the interlocutory decisions of the Tribunal made on 28 February 2022 and 2 May 2022 is refused.' 'The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment