Pideski v Wagga City Council & anor [2010] NSWLEC 1006
The application must be refused because the applicants failed to justify the development of prime crop and pasture land for non-agricultural purposes and the proposed subdivision does not comply with the 'Right to Farm' setback requirements in the DCP, and no justification for varying these requirements was provided.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; development application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'development Control Plan' 'local Environmental Plan' 'subdivision of Land' 'right to Farm']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicants justified the development of prime crop and pasture land for purposes other than agriculture as required by the zone objectives in the LEP' "Whether the proposed subdivision complies with 'Right to Farm' provisions (cl 7.5.33) in Part B of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2005"]
Ratio Decidendi
The application must be refused because the applicants failed to justify the development of prime crop and pasture land for non-agricultural purposes and the proposed subdivision does not comply with the 'Right to Farm' setback requirements in the DCP, and no justification for varying these requirements was provided.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; development application refused
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed' 'Development Application DA07/0383 to subdivide an existing land holding comprising two existing allotments at 15 Brucedale Road, Brucedale, into five rural residential allotments is determined by the refusal of development consent' 'The exhibits, other than Exhibit 3, are returned']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment