Bolzan, Dimitri & Flyover P/L v Leichhardt MC [2005] NSWLEC 323
The proposed four-storey mixed development, although compliant with floor space ratio, is inconsistent and incompatible with the objectives of the relevant planning instruments for this conservation area, particularly in regard to height, bulk, and scale. The development would detract from the streetscape and is not aligned with the heritage conservation aims and desired future character of Norton Street as encapsulated in council's LEP and DCP. The proposal also fails the SEPP 65 principles of context and scale.
- Parties
- Applicant: J Bolzan; Applicant: V Dimitri; Applicant: Flyover Pty Limited; Respondent: Leichhardt Municipal Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under S 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Development Applications, Heritage Conservation, Urban Design, Environmental Planning Instruments, Merits Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J Bolzan
Applicant
V Dimitri
Applicant
Flyover Pty Limited
Applicant
Leichhardt Municipal Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed development is consistent with the heritage conservation area
- 2 Compatibility of the proposed development with Leichhardt Environmental Plan 2000 and Development Control Plan 2000
- 3 Appropriateness of the bulk, height, and scale of the development in the context of the streetscape and conservation area
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed four-storey mixed development, although compliant with floor space ratio, is inconsistent and incompatible with the objectives of the relevant planning instruments for this conservation area, particularly in regard to height, bulk, and scale. The development would detract from the streetscape and is not aligned with the heritage conservation aims and desired future character of Norton Street as encapsulated in council's LEP and DCP. The proposal also fails the SEPP 65 principles of context and scale.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal in respect of the properties known as Nos. 143-149 Norton Street, Leichhardt, is dismissed.
- The development application submitted to Leichhardt Municipal Council, and as amended, for a four storey mixed development containing: three commercial shops at ground level, nine residential units over three levels; and at ground parking for 12 vehicles, is determined by the refusal of consent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment