J H Lever & Co Pty Ltd v Maniotis (No 2) [2006] FCA 1830
The Court, taking a conservative approach based on the nature of costs recoverable on a party and party basis and the available information, ordered the respondents' recoverable costs be fixed in a gross sum of $250,000 as an interim order.
- Parties
- Applicant: J H Lever & Co Pty Ltd; First Respondent: Con Maniotis; Second Respondent: Taste Master Pty Ltd; Third Respondent: Andrew Fotheringham; Fourth Respondent: Brett Copping
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Costs / Post Judgment, Cost Order
- Outcome
- Interim gross sum costs order made in favour of the respondents against the applicant.
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J H Lever & Co Pty Ltd
Applicant
Con Maniotis
First Respondent
Taste Master Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
Andrew Fotheringham
Third Respondent
Brett Copping
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Motion for Costs / Post Judgment, Cost Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondents' costs should be fixed in a gross sum under O 62 r 4(2)(c) of the Federal Court Rules
- 2 Whether an interim order for a gross sum costs order should be made
Ratio Decidendi
The Court, taking a conservative approach based on the nature of costs recoverable on a party and party basis and the available information, ordered the respondents' recoverable costs be fixed in a gross sum of $250,000 as an interim order.
Court Disposition
Interim gross sum costs order made in favour of the respondents against the applicant.
Orders
- The respondents' costs recoverable from the applicant be fixed in a gross sum of $250,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment