J P Morgan Portfolio Services Limited v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu [2005] FCA 1640

J P Morgan Portfolio Services Limited v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu [2005] FCA 1640

The existence of a funding and control arrangement whereby a third party with a genuine commercial interest (in this case, Westpac as owner of the relevant group) funds, controls and receives the benefit of the litigation, does not, without more, constitute an abuse of process. The dispositive question is whether the arrangement tends to corrupt the court's process; on the facts, no such tendency arose as procedural safeguards and commercial realities justified continuation of the proceeding.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 November 2005
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion (strike Out / Stay Application) in Commercial Litigation / Interlocutory Motion – Application to Strike Out or Stay Proceeding for Abuse of Process
Outcome
Application to strike out/stay proceedings dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['abuse of Process' 'litigation Funding' 'maintenance and Champerty' 'standing' 'commercial Litigation' 'strike Out Applications']
['practice and Procedure' 'civil Procedure'] ['abuse of Process' 'litigation Funding' 'maintenance and Champerty' 'standing' 'commercial Litigation' 'strike Out Applications']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion (strike Out / Stay Application) in Commercial Litigation / Interlocutory Motion – Application to Strike Out or Stay Proceeding for Abuse of Process

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the proceeding constituted an abuse of the process of the Court due to third-party funding and beneficial interest arrangements' 'Whether lack of a direct financial interest by the applicant amounts to abuse of process' 'Whether control of proceedings by a party with no direct interest in the outcome supports a permanent stay or strike out']

Ratio Decidendi

The existence of a funding and control arrangement whereby a third party with a genuine commercial interest (in this case, Westpac as owner of the relevant group) funds, controls and receives the benefit of the litigation, does not, without more, constitute an abuse of process. The dispositive question is whether the arrangement tends to corrupt the court's process; on the facts, no such tendency arose as procedural safeguards and commercial realities justified continuation of the proceeding.

Court Disposition

Application to strike out/stay proceedings dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The Notice of Motion filed on 22 July 2005 is dismissed.' 'The applicants on the motion (respondents in the principal proceeding) pay the costs of the motion incurred by the respondent, J P Morgan Portfolio Services Limited.' 'The matter be listed for further directions at 9.30am on Thursday, 24 November 2005.']