Selwan Property Holdings Pty Ltd v Grocon Constructions Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 73

The appellate court was not persuaded that the primary judge erred in the exercise of discretion regarding the costs order resulting from the adjournment, and therefore leave to appeal was refused.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 31 March 2009
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal / Appellate Decision
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics: ['interlocutory Costs Orders' 'leave to Appeal' 'practice and Procedure']

['civil Procedure'] ['interlocutory Costs Orders' 'leave to Appeal' 'practice and Procedure']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Appellate Decision

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from an interlocutory order for costs']

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court was not persuaded that the primary judge erred in the exercise of discretion regarding the costs order resulting from the adjournment, and therefore leave to appeal was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

['Summons dismissed with costs']