Jackson v R [2021] NSWCCA 15
The sentencing judge took into account the applicant's mental condition, substance abuse, and background as mitigating factors but gave proper weight to deterrence and denunciation due to the seriousness and repetitive nature of the domestic violence offences; the aggregate sentence and non-parole period were not manifestly excessive or unreasonable given the totality of offences, prior history, and breach of an ADVO.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jackson; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal, Court of Criminal Appeal (from District Court)
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Appeal, Domestic Violence Offences, Sentencing Principles, Manifest Excess, Consideration of Mental Condition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jackson
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal, Court of Criminal Appeal (from District Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in her approach to the applicant's mental condition
- 2 Whether the aggregate sentence and non-parole period imposed were manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge took into account the applicant's mental condition, substance abuse, and background as mitigating factors but gave proper weight to deterrence and denunciation due to the seriousness and repetitive nature of the domestic violence offences; the aggregate sentence and non-parole period were not manifestly excessive or unreasonable given the totality of offences, prior history, and breach of an ADVO.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment