Jacombe v Jacombe [1961] HCA 25

Jacombe v Jacombe [1961] HCA 25

The Full Court was correct in admitting the documentary evidence from the Riga Supreme Court, which established that the respondent's prior marriage was dissolved before the marriage to the appellant. The ceremony in Jerusalem and prolonged cohabitation further raised a strong presumption of the validity of the marriage, which was not rebutted by sufficient evidence to the contrary.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Full Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales Affirming a Decree for Dissolution of Marriage
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs including costs reserved by the order of 1st September 1960
Legal Topics
['dissolution of Marriage' 'validity of Marriage' 'presumption of Marriage']
['family Law'] ['dissolution of Marriage' 'validity of Marriage' 'presumption of Marriage']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From Full Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales Affirming a Decree for Dissolution of Marriage

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the appellant and respondent were lawfully married at the time of the dissolution decree' 'Whether the respondent had capacity to contract the marriage with the appellant due to a prior marriage']

Ratio Decidendi

The Full Court was correct in admitting the documentary evidence from the Riga Supreme Court, which established that the respondent's prior marriage was dissolved before the marriage to the appellant. The ceremony in Jerusalem and prolonged cohabitation further raised a strong presumption of the validity of the marriage, which was not rebutted by sufficient evidence to the contrary.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs including costs reserved by the order of 1st September 1960

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs including the costs reserved by the order of 1st September 1960']