Jacqueline Fritsch v Maitland City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1259
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 at or after the conciliation conference, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; accordingly, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the agreement without a merits assessment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Proceedings Involving a Development Application, an Appeal Against Orders Pursuant to S.121 B (1) (orders 2 & 12) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, and Deemed Refusal of a Building Certificate / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders Made by Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'building Certificate' 'appeal Against Orders' 'section 34 Conciliation Agreement' 'fencing' 'fill and Earthworks' 'demolition Works']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Proceedings Involving a Development Application, an Appeal Against Orders Pursuant to S.121 B (1) (orders 2 & 12) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, and Deemed Refusal of a Building Certificate / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders Made by Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979" 'Appeal against orders pursuant to s.121B (1) (Orders 2 & 12) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act' 'Deemed refusal of building certificate']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 at or after the conciliation conference, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; accordingly, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with the agreement without a merits assessment.
Court Disposition
Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Orders
- ['Within 3 months from the date of the orders, the applicant shall carry out specified fencing works, including modifying, reducing, rendering and capping the concrete blockwork at the site entrance and placing topsoil in accordance with an approval under s.138 of the Roads Act.' 'The existing cyclone fence shall be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment