Re Moloney, Michael Ex parte Field, Jacqueline Heather [1981] FCA 29
Neither the meeting of creditors nor its chairman was entitled to deny the applicant's proxy the right to vote; the instrument of proxy alone sufficed for proxy attendance and voting, and production of the power of attorney was not additionally required.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jacqueline Heather Field; Respondent: Michael Moloney
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Application for Declaration and Sequestration Order
- Outcome
- declared composition void; application adjourned for further orders
- Legal Topics
- Composition Under Part X, Creditor Voting, Proxy Appointment, Meeting Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacqueline Heather Field
Applicant
Michael Moloney
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Application for Declaration and Sequestration Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the chairman or meeting was entitled to deny the proxy the right to vote
- 2 Proper construction of s. 200 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966
Ratio Decidendi
Neither the meeting of creditors nor its chairman was entitled to deny the applicant's proxy the right to vote; the instrument of proxy alone sufficed for proxy attendance and voting, and production of the power of attorney was not additionally required.
Court Disposition
declared composition void; application adjourned for further orders
Orders
- Declared the composition accepted by the meeting of creditors on 7 November 1980 is void as neither the meeting nor its chairman was entitled to deny the proxy the right to vote.
- Application adjourned to a date to be fixed to determine the questions of a summary sequestration order and costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment