Choi v NSW Ombudsman (No 5) [2022] NSWCATAD 92
The Tribunal refused leave for both the discrimination and victimisation claims because there was insufficient evidence that the applicant was treated less favourably on the ground of disability, or that any detriment was on the ground of her complaints. The complaint was found to lack substance and there were no reasonable prospects of succeeding; accordingly, it would not be fair and just to permit the matters to proceed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Proceed With Discrimination and Victimisation Claims / Determination on the Papers Leave to Proceed
- Outcome
- Leave to proceed with discrimination and victimisation claims refused
- Legal Topics
- ['disability Discrimination' 'victimisation' 'leave to Proceed' 'administrative Decisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Proceed With Discrimination and Victimisation Claims / Determination on the Papers Leave to Proceed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted for a claim of disability discrimination to proceed' 'Whether leave should be granted for a claim of victimisation to proceed' 'Whether sufficient evidence exists to support claims of discrimination or victimisation by the NSW Ombudsman']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal refused leave for both the discrimination and victimisation claims because there was insufficient evidence that the applicant was treated less favourably on the ground of disability, or that any detriment was on the ground of her complaints. The complaint was found to lack substance and there were no reasonable prospects of succeeding; accordingly, it would not be fair and just to permit the matters to proceed.
Court Disposition
Leave to proceed with discrimination and victimisation claims refused
Orders
- ['Leave for the applicant to proceed with a claim of discrimination pursuant to section 96 is refused.' 'Leave for the applicant to proceed with a claim of victimisation pursuant to section 96 is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment