Singh v The Owners Strata Plan 11723 & Ors [2013] NSWSC 1595
Mr Singh has frequently instituted and conducted vexatious proceedings against the First and Third Defendants in New South Wales, with repeated processes lacking reasonable grounds, abusing process, and refusing finality; orders are warranted prohibiting him from commencing proceedings against these parties without leave of the Court.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Vexatious Proceedings Order / Post Dismissal Motion for Orders Under Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008, S 8
- Outcome
- Application granted; orders made under Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008, s 8
- Legal Topics
- ['vexatious Proceedings' 'abuse of Process' 'strata Disputes' 'bankruptcy Annulment' 'enforcement of Judgments']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Vexatious Proceedings Order / Post Dismissal Motion for Orders Under Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008, S 8
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mr Singh has instituted or conducted vexatious proceedings frequently under Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008, s 8' 'Whether the Court should exercise discretion to make orders prohibiting Mr Singh from commencing proceedings against specific defendants' "Appropriate scope of prohibition given litigant's rights to access courts"]
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Singh has frequently instituted and conducted vexatious proceedings against the First and Third Defendants in New South Wales, with repeated processes lacking reasonable grounds, abusing process, and refusing finality; orders are warranted prohibiting him from commencing proceedings against these parties without leave of the Court.
Court Disposition
Application granted; orders made under Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008, s 8
Orders
- ['Plaintiff is prohibited from instituting proceedings against the First Defendant and the Third Defendant in New South Wales without leave of the Court.' "Plaintiff shall pay the Third Defendant's costs of the motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment