Haider v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1369
No jurisdictional error was demonstrated in the Tribunal's decision; the failure of the applicant to provide grounds for jurisdictional error means the appeal would have no reasonable prospect of success. Therefore, there is no basis to grant an extension of time or leave to appeal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jahanzaib Haider; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Associated Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time and associated application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time Applications, Judicial Review, Jurisdictional Error, Default Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jahanzaib Haider
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Associated Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time and leave to appeal against the Federal Circuit Court's dismissal of his judicial review application
- 2 Whether any jurisdictional error was manifest in the Tribunal's decision
Ratio Decidendi
No jurisdictional error was demonstrated in the Tribunal's decision; the failure of the applicant to provide grounds for jurisdictional error means the appeal would have no reasonable prospect of success. Therefore, there is no basis to grant an extension of time or leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time and associated application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The application for an extension of time and associated application for leave to appeal be dismissed.
- The applicant is to pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the application, to be taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment