Ryan v Bright [1939] HCA 15
The poundkeeper, under the Pounds Act 1928 (Vict.), is bound to detain impounded cattle and is entitled to recapture cattle who have escaped the pound peaceably and on fresh pursuit. This recapture does not interfere with the owner’s possession as the owner retains possession both at common law and under statute, but is temporarily deprived of custody. Therefore, the recapture performed in this case was lawful, no trespass or conversion occurred, and the owner's action fails.
- Parties
- Appellant: James Alphonsus Ryan; Respondent: William Bright; Respondent: President, Councillors and Ratepayers of the Shire of Woorayl
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Victoria
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Distress Damage Feasant, Impounding of Cattle, Powers and Duties of Poundkeepers, Recapture of Escaped Animals, Statutory Duties Under Pounds Act 1928 (vict.)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Alphonsus Ryan
Appellant
William Bright
Respondent
President, Councillors and Ratepayers of the Shire of Woorayl
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Victoria
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a poundkeeper under the Pounds Act 1928 (Vict.) has a right to recapture cattle that have escaped from the pound on fresh pursuit without committing trespass or conversion against the owner.
- 2 Whether fresh pursuit is necessary for the lawful recapture by a poundkeeper.
- 3 Whether the establishment and operation of the pound and appointment of the poundkeeper were valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The poundkeeper, under the Pounds Act 1928 (Vict.), is bound to detain impounded cattle and is entitled to recapture cattle who have escaped the pound peaceably and on fresh pursuit. This recapture does not interfere with the owner’s possession as the owner retains possession both at common law and under statute, but is temporarily deprived of custody. Therefore, the recapture performed in this case was lawful, no trespass or conversion occurred, and the owner's action fails.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment