Hart v R [2013] NSWCCA 13
The sentencing judge did not make a finding that the applicant had poor rehabilitation prospects, and the totality of the evidence fell far short of proving that the applicant had good prospects of rehabilitation. The ground of appeal was not made out.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['robbery Whilst Armed With a Dangerous Weapon' 'prospects of Rehabilitation' 'likelihood of Re Offending' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'form 1 Offence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge failed to have any or proper regard to the applicant being unlikely to re-offend and having good prospects of rehabilitation.' 'Whether the evidence established that the applicant had good prospects of rehabilitation or was unlikely to re-offend.' 'Whether the sentencing judge impermissibly concluded that the applicant had poor rehabilitation prospects.']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not make a finding that the applicant had poor rehabilitation prospects, and the totality of the evidence fell far short of proving that the applicant had good prospects of rehabilitation. The ground of appeal was not made out.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment