Bugg v Day [1949] HCA 59
The objections to the trial fail as the summing up was not unfair and clearly stated the issue, neither admission of expert evidence nor evidence of prior convictions warranted a new trial, and fresh evidence was not such as would justify a new trial. Rule 151B bars reliance on lack of direction about convictions, as objection was not raised. The verdict and judgment for the plaintiff should be restored.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court of Australia Appeal From Order for New Trial
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order for new trial set aside; verdict and judgment for plaintiff restored.
- Legal Topics
- ['negligence' 'motor Vehicle Accident' 'civil Procedure' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'impeachment of Witness Credibility' 'new Trial' 'damages']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court of Australia Appeal From Order for New Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the summing up to the jury was unfair to the defendant and failed to properly state the issue of negligence' "Whether evidence of the defendant's prior convictions for traffic offences was admissible" 'Whether admission of expert evidence on speed was improper and grounds for a new trial' 'Whether discovery of fresh evidence justified a new trial']
Ratio Decidendi
The objections to the trial fail as the summing up was not unfair and clearly stated the issue, neither admission of expert evidence nor evidence of prior convictions warranted a new trial, and fresh evidence was not such as would justify a new trial. Rule 151B bars reliance on lack of direction about convictions, as objection was not raised. The verdict and judgment for the plaintiff should be restored.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order for new trial set aside; verdict and judgment for plaintiff restored.
Orders
- ['Order of Full Court set aside' 'Motion for new trial dismissed with costs' 'Verdict of jury and judgment for plaintiff for £2,928 restored' 'Appeal allowed with costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment