Smith v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 156

Smith v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 156

After independently assessing the evidence, the Court was not persuaded that the jury ought to have had a doubt about the appellant's guilt on the indecent assault count. The acquittal on the first count was explicable by the directions given on penetration and did not require rejection of the complainant's evidence about indecent assault. The inconsistencies and alleged influence by the mother were matters for the jury, and no miscarriage of justice was shown.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 June 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Conviction / Appeal to the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal From Conviction After Jury Trial in the District Court
Outcome
Leave to appeal against conviction granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['indecent Assault' 'unreasonable Verdict' 'miscarriage of Justice' 'assessment of Evidence' 'jury Verdict']
['criminal Law' 'criminal Procedure'] ['indecent Assault' 'unreasonable Verdict' 'miscarriage of Justice' 'assessment of Evidence' 'jury Verdict']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Against Conviction / Appeal to the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal From Conviction After Jury Trial in the District Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the verdict of guilty on the indecent assault count was unreasonable and could not be supported having regard to the evidence.' "Whether the acquittal on the aggravated sexual intercourse count undermined the complainant's credit or was inconsistent with the conviction on the indecent assault count." "Whether discrepancies in the complainant's evidence about the sequence of events and the timing of a threat required the verdict to be set aside." "Whether the complainant's mother's response to the complaint may have influenced the complainant's account so as to create a miscarriage of justice."]

Ratio Decidendi

After independently assessing the evidence, the Court was not persuaded that the jury ought to have had a doubt about the appellant's guilt on the indecent assault count. The acquittal on the first count was explicable by the directions given on penetration and did not require rejection of the complainant's evidence about indecent assault. The inconsistencies and alleged influence by the mother were matters for the jury, and no miscarriage of justice was shown.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal against conviction granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Grant leave to appeal against conviction.' 'Appeal dismissed.']