Regina v Murray [2001] NSWCCA 289

Regina v Murray [2001] NSWCCA 289

The trial judge's directions were adequate on the agreement constituting conspiracy and its elements. The admission of the challenged statements and the listening device tapes was made after proper discretion and did not cause miscarriage of justice. On the whole of the evidence, the verdict was open to the jury. The sentence was within the discretionary range and was not excessive given the seriousness of the offence and lack of mitigating factors.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 July 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave granted to appeal against sentence; appeal against sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics
['armed Robbery' 'conspiracy to Commit Armed Robbery' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'sentence' 'mens Rea' 'verballing by Police' 'listening Device Evidence']
['criminal Law'] ['armed Robbery' 'conspiracy to Commit Armed Robbery' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'sentence' 'mens Rea' 'verballing by Police' 'listening Device Evidence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the trial judge erred in directing the jury on conspiracy and its elements' 'Whether the admission of alleged statements by the accused was erroneous' 'Whether the listening device tapes were properly admitted' 'Whether the verdict was unsafe and unsatisfactory' 'Whether the sentence was excessive or should be mitigated due to the conduct of a police informer']

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's directions were adequate on the agreement constituting conspiracy and its elements. The admission of the challenged statements and the listening device tapes was made after proper discretion and did not cause miscarriage of justice. On the whole of the evidence, the verdict was open to the jury. The sentence was within the discretionary range and was not excessive given the seriousness of the offence and lack of mitigating factors.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave granted to appeal against sentence; appeal against sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Appeal against conviction dismissed.' 'Leave granted to appeal against sentence.' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed.']