Hillier v Martin (No 13) [2022] FCA 939
Mr Martin, as a non-party against whom no relief is sought and whose interests are not directly bound by the orders or proposed orders, does not have standing to bring his interlocutory application seeking to re-open argument or to be granted leave to appear and make submissions on the applicant's interlocutory application. Allegations in the proposed statement of claim and potential future effects do not establish standing at this stage; such interests are protected if and when adverse findings or relief are sought against him at trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application by a Non Party to Re Open Argument and for Leave to Appear; Decision on Standing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['standing of Non Party' 'interlocutory Applications' 'joinder of Parties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application by a Non Party to Re Open Argument and for Leave to Appear; Decision on Standing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether a non-party has standing to bring an interlocutory application seeking to reopen argument on the applicant's interlocutory application to join parties and amend pleadings"]
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Martin, as a non-party against whom no relief is sought and whose interests are not directly bound by the orders or proposed orders, does not have standing to bring his interlocutory application seeking to re-open argument or to be granted leave to appear and make submissions on the applicant's interlocutory application. Allegations in the proposed statement of claim and potential future effects do not establish standing at this stage; such interests are protected if and when adverse findings or relief are sought against him at trial.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ["The non-party's application filed on 21 July 2022 is dismissed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment