Wiggins v Pittwater Council [2006] NSWLEC 761
Proper, genuine, and realistic consideration of cl B6.2 of the DCP, together with merits examination and expert evidence as to safety, allows approval of the driveway at greater than 20% gradient as proposed; sufficient evidence supports safe access and flexible application of the standard.
- Parties
- Applicant: James Joseph Kenneth Wiggins; Respondent: Pittwater Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment After Rehearing Remitted by Lloyd J
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- Development Applications, Subdivision, Access Driveways, Gradient Standards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Joseph Kenneth Wiggins
Applicant
Pittwater Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment After Rehearing Remitted by Lloyd J
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed subdivision complies with Pittwater 21 Development Control Plan driveway gradient standards
- 2 Whether departure from DCP standards can be justified based on safety and other merits
Ratio Decidendi
Proper, genuine, and realistic consideration of cl B6.2 of the DCP, together with merits examination and expert evidence as to safety, allows approval of the driveway at greater than 20% gradient as proposed; sufficient evidence supports safe access and flexible application of the standard.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development application No. 214/05 for the re-subdivision of Nos. 91 and 93 Powderworks Road, North Narrabeen, is determined by the granting of development consent subject to conditions in Annexure 'A'.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment