Killen v SafeWork NSW and NSW Rural Fire Service [2019] NSWIRComm 1078
The scope of the Improvement Notice issued by the inspector related to processes applicable across the NSW Rural Fire Service, not limited to Region 1. As these processes affect all staff, including those in the applicant’s workgroup, both the applicant’s and those he represents’ interests are affected. The applicant therefore has standing as an ‘eligible person’ under s 229 of the WHS Act to seek external review. Whether those interests are adversely affected will be determined at the substantive hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- External Review Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Standing and Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Application for orders 2 and 3 of Notice of Motion dismissed; directions and liberty to apply granted; matter listed for further directions.
- Legal Topics
- ['standing for External Review' 'improvement Notice Under WHS Act' 'health and Safety Representative Eligibility']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
External Review Application / Interlocutory Ruling on Standing and Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant has standing as an 'eligible person' under s 229 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) for external review of a decision setting aside an Improvement Notice" 'Scope of improvement notice—whether it affects processes and interests beyond Region 1']
Ratio Decidendi
The scope of the Improvement Notice issued by the inspector related to processes applicable across the NSW Rural Fire Service, not limited to Region 1. As these processes affect all staff, including those in the applicant’s workgroup, both the applicant’s and those he represents’ interests are affected. The applicant therefore has standing as an ‘eligible person’ under s 229 of the WHS Act to seek external review. Whether those interests are adversely affected will be determined at the substantive hearing.
Court Disposition
Application for orders 2 and 3 of Notice of Motion dismissed; directions and liberty to apply granted; matter listed for further directions.
Orders
- ['The application for orders 2 and 3 of the Notice of Motion is dismissed.' 'The parties are directed to consider these reasons and advise by 4 pm on 22 October 2019 whether any redactions are necessary to ensure compliance with the non-publication order.' 'The matter will be listed for directions on 30 October at...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment