Kyros v Stavrakis [2009] NSWSC 163

Kyros v Stavrakis [2009] NSWSC 163

Since the defendant does not challenge the validity or terms of the will and has renounced probate, there is no legitimate reason for the caveat; the caveat must cease to be in force and the plaintiff is entitled to costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 March 2009
Procedural Posture
Succession/probate Proceedings / Application to Remove Caveat
Outcome
Caveat ceases to be in force; defendant to pay plaintiff's costs; consideration of costs orders against defendant's legal practitioners stood over.
Legal Topics
['probate Caveat' 'renunciation' 'family Provision Claim' 'costs Order' 'administration of Estate']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Succession/probate Proceedings / Application to Remove Caveat

  1. 1 ['Whether it is appropriate for the probate caveat filed by the defendant to remain in force when there is no challenge to the validity of the will' 'Whether costs should be awarded against the defendant and/or her legal practitioners']

Ratio Decidendi

Since the defendant does not challenge the validity or terms of the will and has renounced probate, there is no legitimate reason for the caveat; the caveat must cease to be in force and the plaintiff is entitled to costs.

Court Disposition

Caveat ceases to be in force; defendant to pay plaintiff's costs; consideration of costs orders against defendant's legal practitioners stood over.

Orders

  • ['The probate caveat filed by Mary Stavrakis in the estate of Helen Theophanous cease to be in force.' "The defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings." 'Notice to defendant and her solicitors/counsel regarding possible costs orders under s 99 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), to be given in writing within...