Lyons v Wende [2007] NSWSC 100
The Court declined joinder because the matter was a straightforward appeal under s 208L or s 208M of the Legal Profession Act 1987, not an application in the nature of a prerogative writ, and no personal orders or allegations of impropriety were made against the Assessor or members of the Cost Review Panel.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Concerning a Costs Assessment Determination or Decision Under the Legal Profession Act 1987 / Ex Tempore Judgment on Defendants' Notices of Motion Seeking Joinder of the Assessor and Members of the Cost Review Panel
- Outcome
- Application to join the Assessor and members of the Cost Review Panel declined.
- Legal Topics
- ['joinder of Parties' 'costs Assessment Appeals' 'cost Review Panel' 'prerogative Writs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Concerning a Costs Assessment Determination or Decision Under the Legal Profession Act 1987 / Ex Tempore Judgment on Defendants' Notices of Motion Seeking Joinder of the Assessor and Members of the Cost Review Panel
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Assessor and members of the Cost Review Panel should be joined as parties to the appeal.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court declined joinder because the matter was a straightforward appeal under s 208L or s 208M of the Legal Profession Act 1987, not an application in the nature of a prerogative writ, and no personal orders or allegations of impropriety were made against the Assessor or members of the Cost Review Panel.
Court Disposition
Application to join the Assessor and members of the Cost Review Panel declined.
Orders
- ['I decline to order that the Assessor or members of the Review Panel be joined as parties to this action.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment