Monks v Mawhinney [2024] FCA 582

It is not established that Mr Mawhinney committed the act of bankruptcy identified in s 40(1)(h) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), as the evidence did not reliably show he had notified any creditor of a suspension of payment of debts to all creditors or done so with the required deliberateness, and therefore the creditor's petition must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 05 June 2024
Procedural Posture: Creditor's Petition (bankruptcy) / Judgment After Final Hearing
Outcome: Creditor's petition dismissed; applicants to pay respondent's costs.
Legal Topics: ["creditor's Petition" 'act of Bankruptcy' 'suspension of Payment' 'debt Due and Payable' 'notice to Creditors']

['bankruptcy and Insolvency'] ["creditor's Petition" 'act of Bankruptcy' 'suspension of Payment' 'debt Due and Payable' 'notice to Creditors']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Creditor's Petition (bankruptcy) / Judgment After Final Hearing

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the respondent is indebted to the applicants as required by s 44(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)' 'Whether the respondent gave notice that he had suspended payment of his debts within the meaning of s 40(1)(h) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Creditor's petition dismissed; applicants to pay respondent's costs.

Orders

["The second further amended creditor's petition be dismissed." "The applicants pay the respondent's costs."]