REGINA v. PRIEST [2000] NSWCCA 27
No error of law, principle, or material fact shown in the sentencing process; all relevant matters considered; sentence not excessive given gravity and provocation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence' 'malicious Damage by Fire' 'provocation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge erred in findings of fact regarding applicant's motivation" 'Whether insufficient weight was given to the plea of guilty, remorse, contrition, and risk of reoffending' 'Whether the sentence was excessive in light of provocation']
Ratio Decidendi
No error of law, principle, or material fact shown in the sentencing process; all relevant matters considered; sentence not excessive given gravity and provocation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment