R v SELIM [2007] NSWSC 154
The applicant did not establish irredeemable unfairness warranting a permanent stay. There was no deliberate withholding of evidence by the prosecution or its witnesses, and duty of disclosure had not been breached so as to constitute abuse of process. Any late disclosure was the result of error or oversight, not...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Permanent and Temporary Stay Prior to Third Trial
- Outcome
- Applications refused
- Legal Topics
- ['stay of Proceedings' 'disclosure Obligations' 'costs in Criminal Proceedings']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Permanent and Temporary Stay Prior to Third Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a permanent stay should be granted due to alleged persistent non-disclosure by the prosecution' 'Whether a temporary stay should be granted conditional upon payment of costs by prosecution for previous trials' 'Whether the prosecution breached its duty of disclosure to the defence']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not establish irredeemable unfairness warranting a permanent stay. There was no deliberate withholding of evidence by the prosecution or its witnesses, and duty of disclosure had not been breached so as to constitute abuse of process. Any late disclosure was the result of error or oversight, not misconduct. The threshold for granting a temporary stay conditional on payment of costs was also not met as the breaches did not result in relevant prejudice or injustice sufficient to warrant such an order.
Court Disposition
Applications refused
Orders
- ['Application for permanent stay refused' 'Application for temporary stay refused']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment