Byrnes v Brisconnections Management Company Limited [2009] FCA 736

Byrnes v Brisconnections Management Company Limited [2009] FCA 736

The amended statement of claim was struck out and the proceeding dismissed because the proceeding as presently constituted could not succeed: the amended pleading contained fundamental defects including an unsupported change to parties, a group definition in which Mr Byrnes did not fall, inadequate particulars, and allegations that did not make sense. The Court was not confident that a proper further amended pleading would be filed within the requested time, and dismissal would not prejudice the right of Mr Byrnes or any relevant group member to commence fresh proceedings.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 June 2009
Procedural Posture
Representative Proceeding Alleging Misleading or Deceptive Conduct and Defects in a Product Disclosure Statement / Application to Strike Out Amended Statement of Claim and Dismiss Proceeding
Outcome
Amended statement of claim struck out; proceeding dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendants' costs.
Legal Topics
['product Disclosure Statement' 'managed Investment Scheme' 'strike Out of Pleading' 'summary Dismissal' 'group Members']
['corporations Law' 'civil Procedure' 'representative Proceedings' 'trade Practices'] ['product Disclosure Statement' 'managed Investment Scheme' 'strike Out of Pleading' 'summary Dismissal' 'group Members']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Representative Proceeding Alleging Misleading or Deceptive Conduct and Defects in a Product Disclosure Statement / Application to Strike Out Amended Statement of Claim and Dismiss Proceeding

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the amended statement of claim should be struck out.' 'Whether the proceeding as presently constituted could succeed.' 'Whether the plaintiff should be given a further opportunity to file a further amended statement of claim and amended application.' 'Whether the pleaded group description and parties were properly constituted.']

Ratio Decidendi

The amended statement of claim was struck out and the proceeding dismissed because the proceeding as presently constituted could not succeed: the amended pleading contained fundamental defects including an unsupported change to parties, a group definition in which Mr Byrnes did not fall, inadequate particulars, and allegations that did not make sense. The Court was not confident that a proper further amended pleading would be filed within the requested time, and dismissal would not prejudice the right of Mr Byrnes or any relevant group member to commence fresh proceedings.

Court Disposition

Amended statement of claim struck out; proceeding dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendants' costs.

Orders

  • ['The Amended Statement of Claim filed on 15 May 2009 be struck out.' 'The proceeding be dismissed.' "The Plaintiff pay the Defendants' costs of the proceeding." 'Liberty be reserved to the Defendants to file any application they wish to make as to a further order as to costs within seven days.']