Duff, J.W. v. McCulloch, D. & Ors [1985] FCA 679
There is no relevant prohibition in s.7(4) of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 applicable to the tender of lawfully intercepted tapes or transcripts to the Police Tribunal, as the Tribunal (a court) does not fall within the meaning of 'person' referenced in the provision; accordingly, their admission does not breach the Act.
- Parties
- Applicant: James William Duff; First Respondent: Donald McCulloch; Second Respondent: The Police Tribunal of New South Wales; Third Respondent: The Commissioner of Police, New South Wales; Fourth Respondent: The Commissioner of Police, Australian Federal Police
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 1985
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Writs of Prohibition and Injunction / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs; previous injunctions dissolved.
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Intercepted Communications, Jurisdiction for Injunctive Relief, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James William Duff
Applicant
Donald McCulloch
First Respondent
The Police Tribunal of New South Wales
Second Respondent
The Commissioner of Police, New South Wales
Third Respondent
The Commissioner of Police, Australian Federal Police
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Writs of Prohibition and Injunction / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether admission into evidence of lawfully intercepted tapes and transcripts in proceedings other than those described in s.7(6) of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 constitutes a breach of s.7
- 2 Whether the Federal Court has jurisdiction and power to grant relief by prohibition and injunction against Commonwealth officers in this context
Ratio Decidendi
There is no relevant prohibition in s.7(4) of the Telecommunications (Interception) Act 1979 applicable to the tender of lawfully intercepted tapes or transcripts to the Police Tribunal, as the Tribunal (a court) does not fall within the meaning of 'person' referenced in the provision; accordingly, their admission does not breach the Act.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs; previous injunctions dissolved.
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Injunctions made previously are dissolved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment