R v Woodman [2001] NSWCCA 310
No error was shown in the sentencing judge's assessment of the seriousness, the weight given to the offer of reparation, or the applicability of comparative cases or statistics; the sentence imposed was within range and no grounds for interference were established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'dishonesty Offences' 'fraudulent Misappropriation' 'breach of Trust' 'sentencing Principles' 'general Deterrence' 'offer of Reparation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether sentence imposed was outside the appropriate range for the offences committed' "Whether insufficient weight was given to the applicant's offer of reparation in determining sentence"]
Ratio Decidendi
No error was shown in the sentencing judge's assessment of the seriousness, the weight given to the offer of reparation, or the applicability of comparative cases or statistics; the sentence imposed was within range and no grounds for interference were established.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence is granted.' 'Appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment