Regina v Alvarez, Alvarez and McCulloch [2002] NSWCCA 283
The sentences imposed upon each applicant were appropriate given the number and seriousness of the offences, their respective criminal histories, and the material available regarding their subjective circumstances. Allegations of manifest excess and lack of parity were not established. Leave to appeal was granted but all appeals were dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal granted in each case but all appeals dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['armed Robbery' 'multiple Offences' 'special Circumstances' 'parity of Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentences imposed on the applicants were manifestly excessive' 'Whether there was a justifiable sense of grievance regarding parity of sentence among co-offenders' 'Whether special circumstances were properly considered in sentencing']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed upon each applicant were appropriate given the number and seriousness of the offences, their respective criminal histories, and the material available regarding their subjective circumstances. Allegations of manifest excess and lack of parity were not established. Leave to appeal was granted but all appeals were dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal granted in each case but all appeals dismissed.
Orders
- ['Grant application for leave to appeal but appeal dismissed for Jamie Paul Alvarez;' 'Grant leave to appeal but appeal dismissed for Phillip Steven Alvarez;' 'Grant leave to appeal but appeal dismissed for John Anthony McCulloch.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment