Minister for Justice and Customs v Tervonen [2007] FCA 2048
The appeal should be expedited because it raises important questions about the requirements imposed by s 16 of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) and Williams, the Commonwealth's obligation to handle foreign extradition requests expeditiously, and the respondent may be entitled to release from custody if Rares J's decision is given effect subject to a further s 16 notice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal in Extradition Proceedings / Notice of Motion for Expedition of Appeal
- Outcome
- Motion granted; hearing of the appeal expedited, costs reserved, and liberty granted to approach the appeal registrar to fix a hearing date.
- Legal Topics
- ['expedition of Appeal' 'extradition Act S 16 Notices' 'validity of Extradition Notices' 'ministerial Obligations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal in Extradition Proceedings / Notice of Motion for Expedition of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the hearing of the appeal should be expedited.' 'Whether Rares J went beyond the requirements imposed by s 16 of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) and Williams v Minister for Justice and Customs [2007] FCAFC 33, 157 FCR 286 in a manner imposing unwarranted obligations upon the Minister.' 'The obligation imposed upon the Commonwealth by the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) to deal with requests from foreign countries expeditiously.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal should be expedited because it raises important questions about the requirements imposed by s 16 of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) and Williams, the Commonwealth's obligation to handle foreign extradition requests expeditiously, and the respondent may be entitled to release from custody if Rares J's decision is given effect subject to a further s 16 notice.
Court Disposition
Motion granted; hearing of the appeal expedited, costs reserved, and liberty granted to approach the appeal registrar to fix a hearing date.
Orders
- ['The name of the Appellant be amended to read "Minster for Home Affairs".' 'The hearing of the appeal be expedited.' 'Costs reserved.' 'Liberty to the parties to approach the appeal registrar with a view to fixing a date for the hearing of the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment