Connolly v Macartney [1908] HCA 64
Beneficiaries were entitled to be made parties ex debito justitiae before the judgment was drawn up and thus entitled to appeal; the Supreme Court erred in refusing to join them as parties, as the rule is procedural and the circumstances allowed for joinder.
- Parties
- Appellants: Connolly and others; Respondents: Macartney and others; Respondent: Jane Macartney; Trustee/executor: Beckett; Respondents: Trustees of the will of Kesterson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Order of Hood J. in the Supreme Court of Victoria
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Administration Action, Appeals Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Connolly and others
Appellants
Macartney and others
Respondents
Jane Macartney
Respondent
Beckett
Trustee/executor
Trustees of the will of Kesterson
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Order of Hood J. in the Supreme Court of Victoria
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether cestuis que trustent (beneficiaries) should be joined as parties to an action after an adverse judgment when their trustee refuses to appeal
- 2 Whether the Supreme Court of Victoria had jurisdiction to add parties after judgment not yet drawn up
Ratio Decidendi
Beneficiaries were entitled to be made parties ex debito justitiae before the judgment was drawn up and thus entitled to appeal; the Supreme Court erred in refusing to join them as parties, as the rule is procedural and the circumstances allowed for joinder.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the Supreme Court (Hood J.) discharged
- Costs of all parties to be paid out of the corpus of the estate, including application costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment