Oakey v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 22678; Oakey v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 5723 [2009] NSWLEC 1108
The applicant failed to provide expert medical or arboricultural evidence or authoritative literature establishing a reasonable probability of injury from the tree fibres; thus, the statutory test under s 10(2)(b) was not met, and no orders can be made on her applications.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Ex Tempore Judgment
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006' 'risk of Injury From Trees']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Ex Tempore Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Norfolk Island Hibiscus trees are likely to cause injury to a person under s 10(2)(b) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to provide expert medical or arboricultural evidence or authoritative literature establishing a reasonable probability of injury from the tree fibres; thus, the statutory test under s 10(2)(b) was not met, and no orders can be made on her applications.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed
Orders
- ['Both applications are dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment