Markwort v The Nominal Defendant [1999] NSWCA 267

Markwort v The Nominal Defendant [1999] NSWCA 267

The appeal failed because the appellant did not establish that the accident on the disused airstrip occurred on a "public road". The airstrip was on private leasehold grazing land with locked gates and no evidence of the continuing public vehicular use present in Boyton. Nor was there sufficient evidence that any road or track ran across the airstrip at the accident point so as to attract the Western Lands Act or Carlaw argument.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 July 1999
Procedural Posture
Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Against the Nominal Defendant / Appeal From District Court Verdict in Favour of the Defendant
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['definition of Public Road' 'nominal Defendant Liability' 'unregistered Vehicle' 'western Lands Act Leasehold Land' 'public Vehicular Use']
['motor Accidents' 'torts' 'statutory Interpretation'] ['definition of Public Road' 'nominal Defendant Liability' 'unregistered Vehicle' 'western Lands Act Leasehold Land' 'public Vehicular Use']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Against the Nominal Defendant / Appeal From District Court Verdict in Favour of the Defendant

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the disused airstrip on the property was a "public road" for the purposes of s.27 of the Motor Accidents Act.' 'Whether public vehicular use of the airstrip brought the case within Boyton v Nominal Defendant.' 'Whether the statutory covenant under the Western Lands Act 1901 concerning reserves, roads or tracks made the airstrip a public road.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal failed because the appellant did not establish that the accident on the disused airstrip occurred on a "public road". The airstrip was on private leasehold grazing land with locked gates and no evidence of the continuing public vehicular use present in Boyton. Nor was there sufficient evidence that any road or track ran across the airstrip at the accident point so as to attract the Western Lands Act or Carlaw argument.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']