Janos Hoey v Consumer Trader & Tenancy Tribunal & Anor [2002] NSWSC 1023
Because there was no transcript or oral evidence before the Court and the Tribunal's finding that the labelling was inadequate was a finding of fact made on the issue litigated by the parties, the plaintiff did not demonstrate any error of law. The appeal therefore failed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Consumer Trader & Tenancy Tribunal Decision / Judgment on Summons
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal From Tribunal' 'error of Law' 'misleading and Deceptive Labelling' 'fair Trading Act 1987, S 42' 'adequacy of Evidence on Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Consumer Trader & Tenancy Tribunal Decision / Judgment on Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal's finding that the Feed Rite label was inadequate involved an error of law." 'Whether the Tribunal made findings without evidence or failed to give proper weight to evidence.' "Whether the plaintiff discharged the onus of showing an error of law justifying disturbance of the Tribunal's decision."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because there was no transcript or oral evidence before the Court and the Tribunal's finding that the labelling was inadequate was a finding of fact made on the issue litigated by the parties, the plaintiff did not demonstrate any error of law. The appeal therefore failed.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed.
Orders
- ['The Summons is dismissed.' 'The plaintiff is to pay the costs of the Summons.' 'The Exhibits are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment