R v Barker, Jarrod [2013] NSWSC 1934

R v Barker, Jarrod [2013] NSWSC 1934

Bail was refused because the applicant is not entitled to bail under Bail Act s 9(4), given his current custody serving a sentence for another offence, the seriousness of the charges, lack of presumption in favour of bail, and strong Crown case.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Bail Hearing
Outcome
Bail refused
Legal Topics
['bail' 'parole' 'drug Offences' 'criminal Group Participation']
['criminal Law'] ['bail' 'parole' 'drug Offences' 'criminal Group Participation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Bail Application / Bail Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether bail should be granted to an applicant in custody whose parole has been revoked' 'Application of Bail Act s 9(4) when applicant is serving sentence for another offence']

Ratio Decidendi

Bail was refused because the applicant is not entitled to bail under Bail Act s 9(4), given his current custody serving a sentence for another offence, the seriousness of the charges, lack of presumption in favour of bail, and strong Crown case.

Court Disposition

Bail refused

Orders

  • ['Bail refused']