Newman v Whittington [2022] NSWSC 160
Privilege was not waived over the legal advice referred to in the plaintiff’s affidavit as it was not deployed in a manner inconsistent with maintaining confidentiality; however, communications with third parties were not privileged or any privilege was waived by disclosure.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Interlocutory Application Regarding Notice to Produce and Client Legal Privilege
- Outcome
- Application for access to the advice document refused; access to other documents granted; each party’s costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- ['client Legal Privilege' 'defamation' 'waiver of Privilege' 'disclosure of Documents' 'procedural Rulings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory Application Regarding Notice to Produce and Client Legal Privilege
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether client legal privilege applies to documents produced in answer to the defendant's notice to produce" "Whether privilege was waived over legal advice referred to in the plaintiff's affidavit" 'Whether communications with third parties are protected by privilege']
Ratio Decidendi
Privilege was not waived over the legal advice referred to in the plaintiff’s affidavit as it was not deployed in a manner inconsistent with maintaining confidentiality; however, communications with third parties were not privileged or any privilege was waived by disclosure.
Court Disposition
Application for access to the advice document refused; access to other documents granted; each party’s costs in the cause.
Orders
- ["The defendant/cross‑claimant's application for access to the document produced in answer to paragraph 4 of his notice to produce issued on 17 January 2022 be refused." 'The defendant/cross‑claimant be granted access to the documents produced in answer to paragraphs 6, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of his notice to produce...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment