ARNOLD v HANCOCK (DAMAGES 2) [2007] NSWSC 659
The value of retained Workers Compensation rights must be assessed as at the notional trial date of 29 February 2000, consistent with Tipper v Williams (No 2). Both the Common Law verdict and retained rights must be valued on the same date. Damages may include an allowance for the benefit of a lump sum (here, $50,000) if the Plaintiff suffered loss, interest only applies to any difference in favour of the Plaintiff, and nominal damages for breach of contract are warranted.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jason Arnold; Defendant: Ken Hancock, practising as Hancock Alldis; Cross Defendant: Barrister retained by Defendant (name not stated)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil, Negligence and Breach of Contract / Damages Assessment, Post Liability Judgment
- Outcome
- No order; matter stood over for further consideration of damages calculation.
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Negligence, Breach of Retainer, Damages Calculation, Workers Compensation, Loss of Chance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jason Arnold
Plaintiff
Ken Hancock, practising as Hancock Alldis
Defendant
Barrister retained by Defendant (name not stated)
Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil, Negligence and Breach of Contract / Damages Assessment, Post Liability Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Calculation of damages in solicitor negligence
- 2 Proper valuation date for damages and Workers Compensation rights
- 3 Allowance for lump sum value versus periodic payments
Ratio Decidendi
The value of retained Workers Compensation rights must be assessed as at the notional trial date of 29 February 2000, consistent with Tipper v Williams (No 2). Both the Common Law verdict and retained rights must be valued on the same date. Damages may include an allowance for the benefit of a lump sum (here, $50,000) if the Plaintiff suffered loss, interest only applies to any difference in favour of the Plaintiff, and nominal damages for breach of contract are warranted.
Court Disposition
No order; matter stood over for further consideration of damages calculation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment