Hall v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 301
Despite some technical errors and complaints about representation, there was no evidence of miscarriage of justice or manifest excess in sentence. The aggregate sentence was within the proper discretionary range, reflecting the seriousness and extent of offending, and no ground for appellate intervention was established.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jason Daniel Hall; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence, Robbery, Stealing From the Person, Sentencing, Manifest Excess, Competence of Legal Representation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jason Daniel Hall
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the applicant was incompetently represented during sentence proceedings
- 3 Whether there was any miscarriage of justice due to representation
Ratio Decidendi
Despite some technical errors and complaints about representation, there was no evidence of miscarriage of justice or manifest excess in sentence. The aggregate sentence was within the proper discretionary range, reflecting the seriousness and extent of offending, and no ground for appellate intervention was established.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment