R v Evans [2000] NSWCCA 20
Given the circumstances, including significant assistance to authorities, early guilty plea, absence of prior record, and remorse, a notional sentence of fifteen years, discounted by 50% for assistance, results in a total sentence of seven and a half years, which more accurately reflects proper sentencing principle than the original sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; resentenced
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence' 'assistance to Authorities' 'discount for Guilty Plea' 'severity of Sentence' 'resentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the original sentence imposed was manifestly excessive given the assistance to authorities and other mitigating circumstances' 'What is the appropriate discount for assistance provided by the appellant']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the circumstances, including significant assistance to authorities, early guilty plea, absence of prior record, and remorse, a notional sentence of fifteen years, discounted by 50% for assistance, results in a total sentence of seven and a half years, which more accurately reflects proper sentencing principle than the original sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; resentenced
Orders
- ['Application for leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal allowed' 'District Court sentences quashed' 'New sentences imposed: On each count (served concurrently), total sentence of 7.5 years imprisonment, divided into minimum term of 5 years (31 July 1998 to 30 July 2003) and additional term of 2.5 years (from 31 July...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment