Regina v Jason Lisle JOHNSON [1999] NSWCCA 431
The effective sentence of penal servitude for six years for the seven indicted offences, with eighteen further offences taken into account, was not manifestly excessive having regard to the pattern and objective criminality of the offences, the applicant's antecedents, and the statutory maximum penalty. No error was shown in relation to the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW): the Act was not yet in force on the sentencing date, the sentencing judge raised the possibility of Drug Court referral, no adjournment or effective application was made, and the applicant's representative appeared to decide to proceed with sentence in light of eligibility concerns concerning usual residence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentences in the Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave granted to appeal against sentence; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['break, Enter and Steal' 'pleas of Guilty' 'further Offences Taken Into Account' 'drug Court Referral' 'manifest Excess']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentences in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentences imposed for seven offences of breaking, entering and stealing, with eighteen further offences taken into account, were manifestly excessive.' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred by not assessing or referring the applicant for entry into the Drug Court under the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW).']
Ratio Decidendi
The effective sentence of penal servitude for six years for the seven indicted offences, with eighteen further offences taken into account, was not manifestly excessive having regard to the pattern and objective criminality of the offences, the applicant's antecedents, and the statutory maximum penalty. No error was shown in relation to the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW): the Act was not yet in force on the sentencing date, the sentencing judge raised the possibility of Drug Court referral, no adjournment or effective application was made, and the applicant's representative appeared to decide to proceed with sentence in light of eligibility concerns concerning usual residence.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to appeal against sentence; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave be granted to the applicant to appeal against the sentences passed upon him in the District Court.' 'The appeal against such sentences be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment