Milson v R (No 2) [2013] NSWDC 268
Given the mitigating circumstances of the January 2011 offences and their low objective seriousness, sentences of imprisonment were not warranted; in respect of the July 2012 Tweed Heads offences, although objective seriousness was also relatively low, imprisonment was appropriate due to aggravating factors, but execution of the sentences should be suspended.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Sentence Appeal / Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- Sentence appeals upheld.
- Legal Topics
- ['contravention of Domestic Violence Order' 'sentencing' 'breach of Good Behaviour Bonds' 'stalking or Intimidation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Sentence Appeal / Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentences imposed for contravening domestic violence orders and stalking or intimidation were appropriate in the circumstances' 'Whether the mitigating circumstances warranted a different penalty']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the mitigating circumstances of the January 2011 offences and their low objective seriousness, sentences of imprisonment were not warranted; in respect of the July 2012 Tweed Heads offences, although objective seriousness was also relatively low, imprisonment was appropriate due to aggravating factors, but execution of the sentences should be suspended.
Court Disposition
Sentence appeals upheld.
Orders
- ['Sentences imposed in respect of the offences committed in January 2011 set aside.' 'No action to be taken in respect of breaches of the bonds relating to the January 2011 offences.' 'For Tweed Heads offences: sentence of 4 months imprisonment for the first offence and 8 months imprisonment for the second offence;...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment