Melbom v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 22
There was no error in the sentencing judge's application of the totality principle, and the sentences imposed, both individually and in aggregate, were within the sound exercise of the sentencing discretion, given the seriousness, multiplicity, and distinctness of the offences. The appeal does not establish manifest excess or legal error.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jason Neil Melbom; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed after granting extension and leave.
- Legal Topics
- Totality Principle, Proportionality, Manifest Excess, Concurrency and Accumulation of Sentences, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jason Neil Melbom
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in the application of the totality principle
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed for the s.33A(1)(a) offence was manifestly excessive
- 3 Whether the total sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error in the sentencing judge's application of the totality principle, and the sentences imposed, both individually and in aggregate, were within the sound exercise of the sentencing discretion, given the seriousness, multiplicity, and distinctness of the offences. The appeal does not establish manifest excess or legal error.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed after granting extension and leave.
Orders
- An order for the extension of time in which to apply for leave to appeal against sentence be granted.
- Leave to appeal in respect of the sentences imposed be granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment