Williams v Nielssen & Ors [2019] NSWSC 1216
The restraining order was refused because the applicant should first pursue available statutory rights of review before seeking relief from the Court's inherent jurisdiction.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jason Williams; First Defendant: Dr Olav Nielssen; Fifth Defendant: New South Wales Bar Association; Sixth Defendant: South Eastern Sydney Local Health District
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Procedural Directions and Interlocutory Application Refusal
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's interlocutory application for a restraining order refused; procedural orders made; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Case Management Orders, Restraining Orders, Legal Profession Barristers' Practising Certificates, Mental Health and Confinement, Judicial Review Vs Statutory Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jason Williams
Plaintiff
Dr Olav Nielssen
First Defendant
New South Wales Bar Association
Fifth Defendant
South Eastern Sydney Local Health District
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Procedural Directions and Interlocutory Application Refusal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should grant a restraining order preventing the NSW Bar Association from acting upon the suspension of the plaintiff's practising certificate
- 2 Whether the plaintiff should first pursue available statutory rights of review or appeal before seeking judicial intervention
Ratio Decidendi
The restraining order was refused because the applicant should first pursue available statutory rights of review before seeking relief from the Court's inherent jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's interlocutory application for a restraining order refused; procedural orders made; costs reserved.
Orders
- The plaintiff's application for a restraining order to be made today against the NSW Bar Association is refused.
- The plaintiff is to provide a copy of the draft statement of claim to any proposed defendant by 16 September 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment