JASWANT KHERA v JONES [1993] NSWCA 154

The Court refused leave to appeal because the matters raised by Mr Khera were not appropriate grounds for leave, there was no procedural unfairness in the judge's handling of the appointment of receiver, and any errors could be addressed at trial.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Applicant: Jaswant Khera; Respondent: Ian Robert Durston Jones
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 22 November 1993
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal / Hearing and Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal Against Interlocutory Orders
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics: Appointment of Receiver, Interlocutory Orders, Leave to Appeal

Partnership Law Civil Procedure Appointment of Receiver Interlocutory Orders Leave to Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Jaswant Khera

Applicant

Ian Robert Durston Jones

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Hearing and Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal Against Interlocutory Orders

Legal Issues

1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against interlocutory orders appointing Mr Jones as receiver of a partnership
2 Whether Mr Khera suffered any procedural unfairness due to the trial judge's indication regarding the appointment of a receiver

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

The summons is dismissed with costs.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.