Radulovic v Multiweld Engineering Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 970
The further material deterioration suffered by the plaintiff (caudia equina syndrome, loss of sexual and bladder function) was a direct consequence of the workplace injury, not the surgery. As at February 1996, a reasonable person would not have had reasonable cause to believe this deterioration would probably occur; thus, s 151A(5)(c) is satisfied. The evidence established that the plaintiff has a real case to advance, and there is no significant prejudice to the defendant from the delay. It is just and reasonable to grant leave to commence proceedings out of time.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jay Anderson; Defendant: Multiweld Engineering Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury/workers Compensation / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Revoke Election and Leave to Commence Proceedings Out of Time
- Outcome
- Orders granted in favour of plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Election Under Workers Compensation Act, Extension of Time to Commence Proceedings, Material Deterioration of Injury, Requirements Under S 151 a and S 151 D Workers Compensation Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jay Anderson
Plaintiff
Multiweld Engineering Pty Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury/workers Compensation / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Revoke Election and Leave to Commence Proceedings Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff should be permitted to revoke his election to accept lump sum compensation under s 151A(5) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987
- 2 Whether leave should be granted to commence common law proceedings for damages out of time under s 151D(2) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987
Ratio Decidendi
The further material deterioration suffered by the plaintiff (caudia equina syndrome, loss of sexual and bladder function) was a direct consequence of the workplace injury, not the surgery. As at February 1996, a reasonable person would not have had reasonable cause to believe this deterioration would probably occur; thus, s 151A(5)(c) is satisfied. The evidence established that the plaintiff has a real case to advance, and there is no significant prejudice to the defendant from the delay. It is just and reasonable to grant leave to commence proceedings out of time.
Court Disposition
Orders granted in favour of plaintiff
Orders
- Leave is granted to revoke the election made in February 1996.
- Leave is granted to the plaintiff to commence proceedings for damages in respect of an accident which occurred on 13 January 1995 within 14 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment