Cheriachan v Williams [2014] NSWLEC 1210
The only appropriate outcome to prevent further damage is for the tree to be removed, as retaining the tree is not feasible without causing it to become unviable, and the Court is satisfied its roots and trunk are causing significant damage to the applicant's property.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Application / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld; orders made for removal of the tree by the respondent at their cost.
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'damage Caused by Trees' 'orders for Tree Removal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Application / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the tree on the respondent's property has caused damage to the applicant's property" 'What orders, if any, should be made for the removal of the tree']
Ratio Decidendi
The only appropriate outcome to prevent further damage is for the tree to be removed, as retaining the tree is not feasible without causing it to become unviable, and the Court is satisfied its roots and trunk are causing significant damage to the applicant's property.
Court Disposition
Application upheld; orders made for removal of the tree by the respondent at their cost.
Orders
- ['The respondent is to engage and pay for a suitably qualified arborist (minimum AQF level 3) to remove the London Plane tree to ground level and to grind sufficient of the stump to allow the fence to be reconstructed on the boundary line.' 'These works must be done in accordance with the WorkCover NSW Code of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment